Critics of Israel complain ad nauseam that any criticism of the Israeli state gets labeled immediately with cries and charges of ‘anti-Semitism’. While I am not suggesting all criticism of the Israeli state passes the litmus test for anti-Semitism it has become increasingly harder for me to ignore the incredible lack of good faith/good will those same critics exhibit towards any action the Israeli state attempts to defend its citizenry with. Take the hue and outcry against the Israeli state for even discussing the possibility of cutting diesel fuel supplies to the Gaza Strip (just google it – I am feeling lazy as well as running a fever).
Better yet, let me quote Barry Rubin’s latest column at the Israeli Insider, as it illustrates perfectly what I mean.
The story in question here is by Ibrahim Barzak, "Israel cuts fuel, electricity to Gaza," January 7, 2008. Like all individual articles it might be of limited importance by itself but it is an example of a phenomenon which has grown to be almost daily.
In the version run by the Philadelphia Inquirer it carries the following subheadline: "People have only a third of winter needs, said an official. The intent is to halt rocket attacks." It is important to emphasize -- do a computer search if you like -- that this article has been published and broadcast around the world by huge media outlets, not to mention websites.
And the main point -- and impact -- of the story is a fabrication.
Here is the lead:
"With winter deepening, Gazans will be forced to live without lights and electric heaters for eight hours a day because Israel has cut fuel supplies to the territory's only electric plant in half, Gaza's top energy official warned yesterday....
"Yesterday, Kanan Obeid, chairman of Gaza's Hamas-run energy authority, said Gaza now has only 35 percent of the power its 1.5 million residents need."
Well, perhaps Gaza's top energy official said that but it is a lie. AP and the media that depend on AP -- fell for this lie. Or perhaps the author and institution are not so innocent because there is no Israeli source provided for the main issues at stake. When I investigated the story it took me five minutes to get an official who totally denied the claims made by it.
Here is the true story, so obscured by the AP article that one can only believe the distortion was deliberate.
1. Gaza's electricity comes about 70 percent from Israel (the article says 60 percent though this changes nothing about the analysis that follows), 5 percent from Egypt, and 20 percent from Gaza itself.
2. There has been very little cutback in the electricity provided directly by Israel.
3. The only reduction is in supplying diesel fuel, some of which is used in the Gaza generating plant, though more is used by trucks.
4. Thus if the diesel fuel supply was cut back by half, the Gaza generator would lose less than half of its supply, even less if the Hamas government made it a priority. At most, the electricity supply would be cut no more than 10 percent -- not 65 percent.
5. Note also that while it sounds rather horrible not to have electricity eight hours a day, this merely would mean that you don't use electricity when you are sleeping. It should also be added that winter in Gaza is not exactly like Maine.
6. In addition, Barzak tries, and no doubt succeeds, in fooling readers by stating in passing: "The power outages, which will rotate across Gaza." In other words, at worst each sector would only have temporary power reductions, taking turns, rather than -- as the article states earlier -- everyone having eight hours without electricity.
After trying to convince readers that people in Gaza are suffering greatly from existing cuts, the article slips into making its case by talking about things that have not happened yet. The Israeli government wants small cutbacks in the electricity directly applied to the Gaza Strip. Even if these cuts were made -- and this may not happen -- the result would still fall very far short of the claims made about huge reductions and tremendous suffering.
The article continues:
"Israel said the purpose of the cutback was to nudge Palestinians to call on extremists to stop their daily rocket attacks on southern Israel. But Gazans contended they have become targets of unfair punishment, and 10 human-rights groups took that argument to the Israeli Supreme Court."
Note that while, technically, Israel's motive is presented -- so the AP can claim to be balanced -- we are quickly told that this claim is untrue. Israel's statements are questioned; Hamas's statements are accepted as fact.
I'll go one better than Barry Rubin and offer a rationale as to why Hamas's statements are accepted as facts. In fact, I'll offer a simple one compound word consisting of 12 letters and a hyphen as an answer. Does anyone still need to buy a vowel?
Look it has become all convenient for many to forget the Gaza Strip would not be under sanctions if the Hamas leadership would do two very simple things which do not even require the disbursement of one shekel or turn over control of the Gaza Strip to Fatah - recognize Israel as the Jewish state and give up all pretense, either overt or covert, of destroying the Israeli state. That’s it folks - game over.
And for those who prattle on endlessly about the plight of the innocent Gazans, while penning not one word of outrage for the school children of Sderot; let us not forget those same innocent Gazans duly voted to elect overwhelmingly Hamas as parliamentarians to the Palestinian legislature. Hamas did not change one iota of its charter or rationale for existence in order to carry the vote. Sometimes one gets exactly what one votes for, and then some.
Of course, if the Egyptians were running the Gaza Strip, like in the old days of pre-1967 Gaza, most Gazans wouldn’t even notice any power outages as the Egyptians (in their infinite wisdom and exercise of good governance) didn’t invest much in the way of hardwiring the Gaza Strip for electricity. So you can add wiring the entire Gaza Strip for electricity to your list of things to blame the Jews for.
4 comments:
I know just how you feel!
Have you seen our little discussion on this subject on Stageleft? Love it how they totally demolish the arguments that I never make.
Oh, and I've just been called an anti-Israeli lefty on another site.
I had been reading for days the “blatant collective punishment” type posts at a number of sites – Stageleft among them, but it wasn’t until your posting that I went back to read the original discussion. I have to admit I generally disengage after a few lines of the bash Israel postings at most blogs because it is as pointless as trying to nail jell-o to the wall when one engages in those discussions.
I did not hold with the notion that trade sanctions by one nation fall under the domain of the Geneva Convention. It is always overlooked that Gaza shares a border with another country besides Israel and the Egyptians do not set policy via the way of Jerusalem - never have which is part of the reason why Gaza is so heavily armed.
I also hold suspect the whole notion of the naivety/innocent of alleged Palestinian non-combatants (Hamas has deliberately sent out appeals from mosques for women and children to act as shields for their “freedom fighters” when cornered in a fight with the IDF and those appeals are met with a surprisingly large numbers of women and children). The level of indoctrination being perpetrated since the return of Arafat (and has only intensified under Hamas) through the educational & daycare systems, television, radio, mosque, and newspapers leaves little room for any Palestinian “moderate”. I am not saying there are not moderates but when the majority of the electorate votes for a terrorist organization, it does send a rather convincing message of compliance and/or agreement. Then there are those pesky polls which show Gazans generally do approve of terror tactics, but again, is not unexpected due to the years of heavy indoctrination.
What Stageleft and ink never give any credit for, is the intensive public debate in both the Knesset and within the Israeli body politic over actions like decreasing diesel fuel supply to Palestinians. Israelis are considerably more concerned with the general welfare of Palestinians than Palestinians are concerned with Israeli welfare. I mean, when was the last time you saw Palestinians protesting the use of suicide bombings at the legislature building in Ramallah or mass protests in the Gaza Strip against launching kassams against Israel? I have yet to see a Palestinian take the Palestinian Authority to their high court to protest the death sentence for any Palestinian found to have sold land to a Jew. And yet, Israelis use appeals to the High Court all the time to thwart any action by the IDF or Israeli government it deems may hurt ‘ordinary’ Palestinians.
Anyways, I have gone on far too long. You may now be an Israeli hating Leftie but I still have you beat by being single-handedly responsible for the rise of post WW2 anti-Semitism in the world.
:) OK. I surrender. I was told that I am "fueling the fire of anti-Semitism" by a supre zealous girl on my own blog just a couple of days ago, but she did not claim that I did it single-handedly.
Your "Egypt" is an interesting one. Egypt does actually supply fuel to Gaza. Less than 1%. I wonder why so little? Would that be because Gaza is bankrupt?
Glad you saw reason on my claims.
Re: Egypt. Now your onto something. Generally, Egypt will not deliver regular supplies of fuel or electricity for free. So Hamas would have to pay for it and that would cut into the money available for arms and graft.
I believe it was about a year ago when the Israeli electric company threatened to cut off the juice because of non-payment.
If I recall correctly,the Israeli government eventually stepped in and released funds from tax revenues it had collected on behalf of the PA and had not remitted to pay off the outstanding tab. Though, I believe it was a one-off payment but my memory of it could be wrong. There was a great deal of controversy about it from the PA - they were outraged any of "their" money was used to pay off "their" bill.
Post a Comment