Friday, November 09, 2007

may goodness and mercy follow you all the days of your life

Most of us, at one time or another (providing we live long enough) have done something which we knew might be considered either morally or legally wrong. Whether it is speeding or smoking a joint to cheating on a spouse. Most of us never get caught, let alone punished for all our transgressions. Some of us have gotten nabbed but have had the good fortune to experience a little mercy and compassion at hands of a police officer, a judge or a wife, and walked away relatively unscathed - and hopefully even a little older and a little wiser from the experience. But not everyone catches a little mercy and compassion when it is most needed. Nor can everyone dig themselves back from the brink even when they do experience it.

One of the last cases I worked on during my time as a criminal law clerk concerned a 12 year old boy who stood accused of three counts of robbery. One the surface the charges were very serious, and because of the gravity of the charges and his age, he could not be released from detention until his legal guardian appeared in court so that a judge could set conditions for his release.

The boy had spent three weeks in detention from the time of his arrest. Normally, his parents or legal guardian would appear in court the day following his arrest and a justice would hear the charges and decide if detention was warranted, and if not, set conditions for bail. One of the crown prosecutors called my law office looking for a regular defense counsel for this young boy.

The Crown counsel was moved by the plight of this young boy to try to find him a regular lawyer in the hopes of convincing his legal guardian, the boy’s grandmother, to appear in court, so the child's release could be arranged. Even if we could not convince his grandmother to appear in court, we as regular counsel, could make an emergency plea in family court to have the Children’s Aid Society take temporary custody of the child. Either way, he would be released.

Once a synopsis of the charges was read there was no way any judge would order the detention of this child until trial, and at the time, a criminal trial in Toronto could take up to a year to be held. The crown counsel faxed over a copy of the police disclosure in the hopes of swaying me, and by extension, one of the lawyers to represent the child.

The police disclosure read that at lunchtime in the school playground the accused approached three other boys who were each eating a bag of potato chips. The accused approached the victims and demanded some chips from each of them. They refused. Then it was alleged that the accused reached in and grabbed by force chips from each of the bags of the boys. The three boys immediately ran with their bags of potato chips to the school office and told their story to the principal. The principal called the police as was his directive according to the school’s zero tolerance policy. And the rest, as they say, is history.

The little boy had been abandoned by his mother who was a known drug addict and his father had died from aids while serving a long term jail sentence. He came to live with his maternal grandmother who was a religious fundamentalist. When she heard he had been arrested by the police for three counts of robbery she washed her hands of him. She claimed he was a demon spawn from the beginning and this was her proof. And for the record, potato chips were the devil’s food. It was a conversation I have yet to forget, and never have I so despaired of another human being like I did of this woman.

I cannot tell you how the case was resolved and if the boy went on to be a productive member of society. I left the law firm before the matter was resolved but my experience suggests it highly improbable. Too many strikes against him with so little love and compassion always equal a bad end.

But I think about him all the time when I read about young accused, charged on the surface with very serious crimes, just like this group of 12 to 13 year olds alleged offenders – taken from a Toronto Star report:
Seven boys charged with sexually assaulting four girls at a northwest Toronto middle school made their first court appearance today, with two of their parents complaining that their children are stressed out from the charges, which they call exaggerated.

"He's losing his hair. He can't sleep," said the mother of one 13-year-old boy facing two sexual assault charges.

"He said, 'Mom, we were just playing around. I hugged her around the waist,' " the mother told reporters.

Eight boys, 12 and 13, are accused of holding and groping four 13-year-old girls on Smithfield Middle School property in northwest Toronto during an after hours basketball game on Sept. 25. All are students at the school.

And I think that somewhere between the strict adherence of dotting every ‘I’ and the crossing of every ‘T’ of the law and the application of common sense; there has to be a balance. I just despair of every finding it.

4 comments:

Neo Conservative said...

*
sorry kateland... there's no way this (some potato chips) is all there is here.

at my son's school, there is a troubled kid who gets into fights on a weekly basis... last i heard of him, he choked out a kid in the playground... and he just gets his regular punishment... a weeks suspension... which i'm sure he loves.

the kid in your parable must have had a psych history, or threatened to kill these kids... to be put away like you describe.

it's sad that he's been euchred by life... but there's a greater good to be considered... the non-sociopathic school population.

two words... jordan manners.

*

K. Shoshana said...

Neo - There are troubled children, and then there are troubled children.

A great deal depends on the principal attitudes towards troubled children. Some practise zero tolerance, some do not. This child never threatened to kill the other boys, believe me, if he had been he would have been charged with uttering death threats or assault as well as robbery x 3.

In Canada, to be be convicted of assault does not necessarily require the accuse to have actually hit the defendant, just reasonable belief that the accused had the intention to hit the victim.

If he had used a weapon, say a pocket knife, he would have been charged with armed robbery. The police practise is to literally paper you with charges in the hopes one or two will actually stick.

Was he a happily socialized child - I doubt it. I suspect he would have been relatively moody and defiant. That grandmother was a real piece of business and if I had been her daughter I would have grown up to take drugs too. Anything to escape her.

I have actually seen a principal at a downtown school pick up a child, throw him a garbage bin and tell him he is nothing but trash and leave him crying there.

Boy, was he surprised to have his actions witnessed by an adult but he was principal there for many years - all I could think of was all the opportunities he had to degrade other children during his tenure.

My oldest son got referred to regularly as a "thug" by his last elementary principal - and he never got into a fight with another child during the principal's tenure. In fact, this principal was simply looking for any excuse to have my son removed from the school. It was one of the hardest years I had to live through. If I hadn't warned my son explicitly how easily it was to be charged with any kind of offence, I don't think we would have made it through the year. He knew the principal was out to get him.

Let me tell you what I believe will happen in the sexual assault case. The court will have them boys appear once a month until a trial date has been set, and sometime around a preliminary hearing, the Crown will offer the boys a deal per say, probably called alternative measures. The boys will have to do some kind of community service, sign a peace bond to be of good behavior for a year and then the charges will disappear. Of course, the boys and their families will be very happy to 'have caught a break' and accept alternative measures rather than risking trial and having an unwanted hug and kiss mark their sons as sexual predators for life.

The truth is, the real break should have happened in the principal's office.

I suspect the boys actions while technically sexual assault, were not very substantial, and never crossed the nuisance line...I can't count the men who have attempted to grab me and kissed me,
throughout the years. Should I have called the cops rather than a well placed knee to the groin or an elbow to the nose on every one of them? I'm 45 years of age, the numbers would have been legion. Should they all have been convicted and branded as sexual predators? Some times one has to use a little discretion rather than using the law to beat teenagers over the head with.

Neo Conservative said...

*
"kateland said... never threatened to kill the other boys, believe me"

what you are saying here, is that school authorities, the cops and the legal system are conspiring to lock up a child whose only offense was to grab some snack food off other children?

what's the motive here? systematically evil principals, racist cops, corrupt prosecutors?

sorry, that just doesn't scan.

if you really believe that's what happened here... how could you bear to live in toronto?

whatever bad experiences your son may have had, which i am not questioning... you can't just transfer your feelings to potato-chip boy.

sorry... there's obviously more here.

*

K. Shoshana said...

Almost every single day I wake up deeply regretting living here. If my husband was still alive I doubt that we would still be here. For the time being, other considerations keep me here.

Of course, you don’t want to accept what I am saying about potato chip boy because what does it say about our system? No one wants to believe that the resources of police, our court systems, and legal aid are put to use in such a frivolous manner.

To use the full weight of the legal system to punish a child over potato chips but that is exactly what happened. Other days I actively helped some very evil and terrible people escape punishment; which is why I will no longer work in criminal law. I lost all respect for the justice system by working as a law clerk. If you had any idea what goes on on a regular basis it would blow your fracking mind. Why do you think when I heard about the Toronto 18; I suggested all may not be what it seems and was one of the few conservative bloggers to suggest it. What are we down to now? 12 accused because the others have had there charges stayed as I suggested it might be.

What you don’t seem to understand is the school board has set up a system wherein a principal is to follow a set procedure. It is not for him to make a determination of guilt or mete out punishment per say once a child reaches the magic age of 12. Some principals ignore the board’s directives, others won’t, but there is a set procedure here. And yes, the justice system is often used to bludgeon 12 year olds over the head with. So much easier to push the issue onto someone else’s shoulders.

My point in sharing my experiences of potato chip boy was to act as a caution for when one reads these rather sensational charges in the paper. Rarely is anything exactly as it is initially reported.