Generally, I find them a pretty inoffensive lot. Personally, I have through the years received more than a few pointed looks of disapproval from well-suited ernest young men who are busy doing their missionary work in the neighborhood as the Tribe and I are going out and about, but overal they meet the neighbor sniff test. In other words, I have had no ongoing disputes with any Mormons that I know of - but this could change on a moment’s notice.I found this LA Times article on DNA evidence conflicting with some core Mormon teachings that really astounding me:
From the time he was a child in Peru, the Mormon Church instilled in Jose A. Loayza the conviction that he and millions of other Native Americans were descended from a lost tribe of Israel that reached the New World more than 2,000 years ago. "We were taught all the blessings of that Hebrew lineage belonged to us and that we were special people," said Loayza, now a Salt Lake City attorney. "It not only made me feel special, but it gave me a sense of transcendental identity, an identity with God."
A few years ago, Loayza said, his faith was shaken and his identity stripped away by DNA evidence showing that the ancestors of American natives came from Asia, not the Middle East. "I've gone through stages," he said. "Absolutely denial. Utter amazement and surprise. Anger and bitterness."
For Mormons, the lack of discernible Hebrew blood in Native Americans is no minor collision between faith and science. It burrows into the historical foundations of the Book of Mormon, a 175-year-old transcription that the church regards as literal and without error. For those outside the faith, the depth of the church's dilemma can be explained this way: Imagine if DNA evidence revealed that the Pilgrims didn't sail from Europe to escape religious persecution but rather were part of a migration from Iceland — and that U.S. history books were wrong.
Critics want the church to admit its mistake and apologize to millions of Native Americans it converted. Church leaders have shown no inclination to do so. Indeed, they have dismissed as heresy any suggestion that Native American genetics undermine the Mormon creed. Yet at the same time, the church has subtly promoted a fresh interpretation of the Book of Mormon intended to reconcile the DNA findings with the scriptures. This analysis is radically at odds with long-standing Mormon teachings. Some longtime observers believe that ultimately, the vast majority of Mormons will disregard the genetic research as an unworthy distraction from their faith.
"This may look like the crushing blow to Mormonism from the outside," said Jan Shipps, a professor emeritus of religious studies at Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, who has studied the church for 40 years. "But religion ultimately does not rest on scientific evidence, but on mystical experiences. There are different ways of looking at truth."
According to the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, an angel named Moroni led Joseph Smith in 1827 to a divine set of golden plates buried in a hillside near his New York home. God provided the 22-year-old Smith with a pair of glasses and seer stones that allowed him to translate the "Reformed Egyptian" writings on the golden plates into the "Book of Mormon: Another Testament of Jesus Christ." Mormons believe these scriptures restored the church to God's original vision and left the rest of Christianity in a state of apostasy. The book's narrative focuses on a tribe of Jews who sailed from Jerusalem to the New World in 600 BC and split into two main warring factions.
The God-fearing Nephites were "pure" (the word was officially changed from "white" in 1981) and "delightsome." The idol-worshiping Lamanites received the "curse of blackness," turning their skin dark. According to the Book of Mormon, by 385 AD the dark-skinned Lamanites had wiped out other Hebrews. The Mormon church called the victors "the principal ancestors of the American Indians." If the Lamanites returned to the church, their skin could once again become white.
All of which makes me conclude that untreated mental illness combined with long periods of fasting is a truly devastating disaster of biblical proportions. Oh, and Big Nana, you can put the kibosh on your hopes of trying to marry off the Dreadie to the baker's daughter.
(tipped off by The Corner)
3 comments:
What you say isn't true. If you want REAL info go to www.mormon.org Where the heck did you come up with those DNA stories? *laughs histericly* Poor you.
Look, I am just commenting on something a reporter wrote and add my own observation to it. So let me guess, your a Lamanite who never morphed?
I actually do like Donny (especially as Joseph) Marie seems a little odd but not really in a bad way.
My wife and I went to Hawaii for our honeymoon and visited the Polynesian Cultural centre which is the centre of a fairly large and well established Mormon community on the islands. I noticed that the people are beautiful, both in spirit and physically. They live a very healthy lifestyle, no smoking, no drinking, always pleasant and quite enjoyable to meet.
So based on that experience, I would agree that they are completely unoffensive and probably very nice neighbours. The few occasions when they have come to my door, they were polite even when I told them I wasn't interested in their message of faith.
You questioned whether they can be considered christian; I would have to answer no. I notice that they mention Jesus quite a lot in their sales pitch, but he really plays an insignificant part in the prophecies of Joseph Smith. I suspect keeping Jesus front and center in their public face, is a strategic way of making their message more appealing and safe to potential converts who are already comfortable with good old fashioned christian religiosity.
The lost tribe of Israel connection is probably another way of validating the foundations of their faith. It's not surprising that the DNA evidence would really shake them badly.
Mormonism gets pretty wierd the deeper you look into it, but if you don't care about that, I'd just call them misguided, and as Douglas Adams would say, "mostly harmless".
Post a Comment