Wednesday, December 21, 2005

Never again until tomorrow

The Jerusalem Newswire Service is carrying a report on statements issued by Iranian Ayatollah, Ali Akbar Hashemi-Rafsanjani:
Two-times former Iranian leader Ayatollah Ali Akbar Hashemi-Rafsanjani said earlier this month that the Muslim world would win a nuclear exchange with Israel, aggravating fears Tehran's quest for atomic weapons indeed has one purpose: the annihilation of what it calls the Zionist “cancer.”

“[The] application of an atomic bomb would not leave anything in Israel - but the same thing would just produce damages in the Muslim world,” Hashemi-Rafsanjani was quoted as saying by the government-controlled Iran Press Service.

The spiritual leader, who wields ultimate power in Iran, made the comments during a prayer service in Tehran. It was the first time an Islamic leader of such prominence openly suggested a nuclear attack against the Jewish state, media analysts told the IPS. Iran has been pursuing atomic weapons in defiance of international demands.

Now we know the nature of the homily that an Ayatollah preaches in the mosque. But not to worry because those butt kicking European Union thinkers are busy contemplating a way to kick Mullah butt in the 2006 World Cup Soccer Tournament:
But neither Israel nor the US are keen to utilize military force in order to thwart Iran's destructive intentions, and have therefore turned to Europe, which enjoys amicable ties with Tehran, to diplomatically resolve the issue. European officials vowed to deal with Iran's worrying behavior at a European Union summit that opened in Brussels Thursday, warning that the continent's patience with Tehran is wearing thin. However, the most serious punitive diplomatic measure being discussed is Iran's exclusion from the 2006 World Cup soccer tournament scheduled to take place in Germany next summer.

While the comments are disturbing in their own right, they represent nothing new under the Iranian sun. The element that I find truly disturbing of this news piece is a report alluded to that was published by the US Army College and quoted in the article:
Meanwhile, a report published by the US Army War College this week said neither military nor diplomatic efforts were going to stop Iran's nuclear weapons program. Entitled “Getting Ready for a Nuclear-Ready Iran”, the report pointed out that “given Iran's extensive nuclear know-how and capabilities, it is unlikely that the United States or its allies can deny Iran the technical ability to covertly make nuclear weapons.”

The authors instead suggested that Israel try to set an example by first dismantling its nuclear capabilities. They admitted, however, that Iran would likely not follow suit, leaving Israel without a deterrent in the crosshairs of a regime with both the desire and the means to annihilate the Jewish state.

I never would have expected this from any report published by the US Army College. Silly me, I thought the whole lay down and die damn Jew theme ended at the gates of Auschwitz but I guess that there is truly nothing new under the sun.

4 comments:

Jay Currie said...

Sadly, the entire idea seems to be that a) it is up to Israel to defend itself, b) if it does so it will be accused of attrocity.

The good news is that the Israelis couldn't and shouldn't give a rat's ass for world opinion.

John the Mad said...

This is very serious stuff that is receiving no where near the attention it should.

Israel should unilaterally disarm, eh. Not too damn likely. There is an expression in the military which is appropriate. That analyst definitely has "shit for brains."

Anonymous said...

jaycurrie hit the nail on the head. I was thinking along similar lines about about a similar issue the other day; Israel can defend hereself of course, only not really. I guess we can get mad and shake our fingers at the enemy, but we must remember the peace process. We wouldn't want to break the peace by responding to terror...(an parphrase of an actual headline I read once)

K. Shoshana said...

The irony Rachel Ann is that there never really has been a peace process - there are only these periods of calm that follow Israeli actions - until the next Arab offensive. The disengagement from Gaza has brought no peace but constant kassam fire - now orignating from the former Israeli settlements. Nor are there any peace partners for the Israelis and their alleged friends are proving to be a very fickle lot.